Kivo Daily Staff, Author At Kivo Daily

Cello Against the Noise: Music, Neurodivergence and the Strange Art of Being Yourself

Kivo Daily Staff on August 14, 2026

By: Marcus Ellington

The music business has always had a peculiar relationship with outsiders. It worships them after they become successful and tries desperately to straighten them out beforehand. Every generation produces artists who are told they are too strange, too intense, too complicated, too difficult to categorize, and then, if fortune smiles, those very qualities become the mythology upon which careers are built.

Enter Cello, an artist for whom being different isn’t a costume purchased at some fashionable boutique of rebellion. It is simply the condition of existence.

Cello is autistic and has ADHD, facts that could easily become promotional shorthand in an era when identity is routinely compressed into hashtags. But reducing Cello to his neurodivergence would miss the point spectacularly. Autism and ADHD aren’t gimmicks attached to the music. They are elements of the perceptual machinery producing it.

And that distinction is important.

Cello’s career has increasingly been built around turning internal experience into public communication. His music inhabits those uncomfortable territories where anxiety rubs against hope, isolation encounters connection, and identity becomes something constantly examined rather than permanently settled.

His album Singing to Serpents may be the clearest expression of that artistic personality.

Even the title sounds like something from mythology: the musician standing before creatures traditionally associated with danger, temptation, knowledge, and transformation, attempting not to kill them but to communicate with them.

That’s practically a definition of songwriting.

Cello doesn’t run from emotional serpents. He sings to them.

The record moves through questions of belonging, self-acceptance, fear, faith and resilience without pretending that three minutes and a catchy chorus can solve them. There is something refreshingly unfashionable about that approach. Much contemporary pop arrives determined to tell listeners exactly how they should feel. Cello seems more interested in documenting what feeling actually resembles when nobody is watching.

His neurodivergence inevitably becomes part of this equation.

Autism and ADHD can influence attention, sensory experience, communication and the way an individual processes the surrounding world. For an artist, those differences can become creative materials. Cello’s work frequently carries the sensation of someone examining emotional details under magnification, noticing contradictions and textures that another songwriter might discard on the way to the chorus.

Then there is intensity.

Popular music desperately needs intensity, although the industry frequently attempts to manufacture it. Producers add another guitar, another vocal track, another beat, another digital explosion.

Cello’s intensity originates somewhere else.

It comes from investment.

You sense that these songs matter to the person singing them. The difference is enormous. Technology can make practically anyone sound dramatic. It cannot make someone sound invested.

That sincerity has helped Cello develop an artistic identity in which vulnerability isn’t presented as weakness or heroic triumph. It simply exists. There are doubts. There are victories. There are moments when the world makes sense and others when it appears to have been assembled without consulting the instruction manual.

In other words, there is life.

That may explain why the neurodivergent aspect of Cello’s story has relevance beyond biography. There are young musicians, writers, and artists growing up believing that success requires sanding away whatever makes them unusual. Social media has only intensified the contradiction. Everyone is encouraged to “be authentic,” provided that authenticity fits neatly into a fifteen-second video.

Cello offers another possibility.

Don’t eliminate the difference.

Investigate it.

Turn it into something.

His career suggests that the peculiarities of perception, the obsessive focus, emotional intensity, unconventional associations, and restless movement of thought can become artistic resources when given structure. Music supplies that structure. Rhythm organizes chaos. Melody gives emotion somewhere to travel. Lyrics transform private thought into something another human being can recognize.

That is where Singing to Serpents becomes more than an album title.

The serpent can be anxiety. It can be self-doubt. It can be the expectations of other people. It can even be the music industry itself, forever whispering that an artist might become successful if only he became slightly more like somebody already successful.

Cello’s answer appears to be remarkably simple: keep singing.

There is no guarantee attached to that philosophy. Independent music rarely offers guarantees. Careers rise, disappear, return, and mutate. Algorithms change. Audiences move elsewhere. Yesterday’s indispensable platform becomes tomorrow’s digital ghost town.

What survives is identity.

Cello has one.

He is a neurodivergent artist making emotionally candid music in an industry frequently devoted to emotional simulation. His autism and ADHD are neither tragic obstacles nor magical superpowers. They are pieces of a complicated human being whose particular way of experiencing the world has helped shape his particular way of making music.

And perhaps that’s the most interesting thing about Cello.

He isn’t asking the world to overlook what makes him different.

He’s asking us to listen to what happened because of it.

Business Term Loans vs Working Capital Advances: Which One Actually Fits Your Situation

Kivo Daily Staff on August 12, 2026

A bakery owner I know spent an entire weekend confused between two financing offers that looked, on the surface, remarkably similar. Both promised roughly $35,000. Both came from reputable direct lenders. Both had reasonable sounding terms. What she couldn’t figure out was why one was structured so differently from the other, and more importantly, which one actually made sense for what she needed the money for. That confusion is incredibly common, and it usually comes down to not understanding the fundamental difference between a term loan and a working capital advance.

These two products get discussed almost interchangeably in casual conversation, but they’re built for genuinely different purposes, and picking the wrong one for your specific situation can quietly cost you more than the interest rate alone would suggest.

The Structural Difference That Actually Matters

A business term loan works the way most people instinctively think a loan works. You receive a lump sum up front, and you repay it over a defined period through regular, typically monthly, payments at a set interest rate. The total cost is generally lower relative to the amount borrowed, and the repayment structure tends to be more predictable, since you know exactly what you owe each month and exactly when the loan will be fully repaid.

A working capital advance operates on a different rhythm entirely. Rather than a fixed monthly payment stretched over months or years, repayment typically happens through smaller, more frequent deductions, often daily or weekly, pulled directly from your business bank account or as a percentage of your revenue. The total repayment period tends to be considerably shorter, often measured in months rather than years, and the pricing structure frequently uses a factor rate rather than a traditional interest rate.

Why the Repayment Rhythm Changes Everything

This difference in repayment frequency isn’t just a technical detail, it fundamentally changes how each product feels to actually live with as a business owner. A term loan’s monthly payment is predictable and easy to plan around, but it also means a large chunk of cash leaves your account all at once each month regardless of how that specific month is performing.

A working capital advance’s daily or weekly deductions are smaller individually, which can make cash flow feel less disruptive on any single day, but the cumulative effect requires careful attention since those small deductions add up continuously rather than in one predictable monthly event. Business owners with naturally variable daily revenue, restaurants, retail stores, service businesses with fluctuating client volume, often find this rhythm easier to manage than a fixed monthly obligation that doesn’t care whether this particular month was strong or weak.

Matching the Product to the Actual Purpose

The single most useful question to ask yourself before choosing between these two products is how long the benefit of the financing will actually last. If you’re funding something with a long, ongoing return, a piece of equipment that will generate revenue for years, a location buildout, a major hire whose value compounds over a long period, a term loan’s longer repayment period genuinely matches the timeline of the benefit you’re capturing.

If you’re funding something short term and specific, bridging a seasonal gap, covering a temporary cash flow crunch while waiting on a large receivable, capturing a time sensitive inventory opportunity, a working capital advance’s shorter repayment window matches that shorter term need far more naturally. Using a long term loan for a short term need means you’re potentially paying interest on capital long after you’ve already captured the benefit it was meant to fund. Using a short term advance for a long term need means facing a repayment pace that may not give the investment enough time to actually generate the return you were counting on.

The Cost Comparison Nobody Explains Clearly

Comparing the actual cost between these two products requires converting both to the same unit of measurement, since a term loan’s interest rate and a working capital advance’s factor rate aren’t directly comparable numbers. The only honest comparison is total dollars repaid for a given amount borrowed over a realistic timeline for each product.

A $30,000 term loan at a reasonable interest rate repaid over three years might total $34,000 to $36,000 in repayment. A $30,000 working capital advance repaid over six months might total $37,000 to $39,000. On the surface, the term loan looks cheaper, and for that specific comparison, it typically is. But that comparison only holds if you actually qualify for the term loan’s longer approval timeline and more extensive documentation requirements, and if your situation can genuinely wait for that process rather than needing capital within days.

Qualification Requirements Tend to Differ Too

Beyond cost and structure, these two products often have meaningfully different qualification thresholds. Term loans, particularly from banks, tend to require longer operating history, stronger personal credit, and sometimes collateral, reflecting their longer commitment and typically lower cost. Working capital advances, especially from direct lenders using automated underwriting, tend to have more accessible qualification standards precisely because the shorter repayment period and higher pricing offset some of the additional risk the lender takes on.

This means the choice between these products isn’t always purely about preference. A newer business or one with a less established credit history may simply have more realistic access to a working capital advance than to a traditional term loan, regardless of which product would theoretically fit their need better. Direct lenders including fundivi offer both structures, evaluating each application against bank account performance to help determine which product a specific business actually qualifies for rather than forcing every applicant into a single rigid category.

A Side by Side Look at Real Numbers

It helps to see this comparison worked out concretely rather than in the abstract. Consider two businesses each borrowing $30,000. The first takes a term loan at nine percent interest repaid monthly over three years, ending up with total payments somewhere around $34,300, spread out at roughly $953 per month. The second takes a working capital advance at a 1.3 factor rate repaid over six months through daily deductions, ending up owing $39,000 total, deducted in smaller increments of roughly $300 per business day.

The term loan clearly costs less in total dollars. But notice what each business is actually solving for. The first business has three years of predictable, lower monthly payments it can plan around easily. The second has a much shorter total commitment, fully repaid within six months rather than stretching across three years, which matters enormously if that business expects its financial picture to look completely different by the time next year arrives. Neither structure is objectively better. They’re simply optimized for different situations, and the right choice depends entirely on which situation actually describes your business right now.

Making the Actual Decision

For the bakery owner, the answer turned out to be straightforward once she articulated what she actually needed the money for. She wanted to fund a new commercial oven that would let her take on wholesale accounts, a purchase with a return that would play out over years, not months. A term loan with a longer repayment period matched that timeline far better than a working capital advance would have, even though the working capital offer had promised faster access to funds she didn’t actually need that urgently.

That’s really the exercise every business owner should walk through before signing anything. Write down exactly what the money is for and how long you expect the benefit to last. Then match the repayment structure to that timeline rather than to whichever offer arrived first or sounded the most familiar. The right product isn’t universally better, it’s the one that actually fits the shape of your specific need.

There’s one more question worth asking yourself honestly before you decide: how confident are you in your ability to predict your business’s cash flow over the full repayment period. A term loan’s fixed monthly payment assumes a certain baseline stability that a genuinely unpredictable business might struggle to assure three years out. A working capital advance’s shorter horizon means you’re only committing to a repayment pace you can reasonably forecast for the next several months, which for many business owners feels like a far more manageable promise to make to themselves. Neither answer is wrong. It just depends on how much certainty you actually have about where your business will be a year or three years from now, and being honest about that uncertainty is often the most useful part of the entire decision.

What to Consider Before Cutting a Loved One Out of Your Will in 2026

Kivo Daily Staff on August 12, 2026

Deciding to leave a family member out of your will is rarely easy. Even when the reasons feel clear to you, the decision can carry emotional weight, and it can also open the door to legal challenges after you are gone. Family relationships are complicated, and estate plans often come with years of history that outsiders cannot fully see.

If you are thinking about disinheriting a spouse, child, sibling, or other relative, it helps to understand how the law treats these decisions. A will that is not written carefully can be challenged, delayed, or even overturned in court. An estate planning attorney can help you put your wishes into a document that holds up to scrutiny and reflects your true intentions.

Common Reasons People Choose to Cut Somebody Out of an Estate Plan

You may choose to leave a relative out of your will for many personal reasons. Some common examples include:

• A long history of estrangement or a broken relationship with the family member

• Concerns that the person would mismanage or waste an inheritance

• A belief that the person is already financially secure and does not need the assets

• Substance abuse or a pattern of harmful behavior

• A desire to leave more to a caregiver who provided years of support

• Financial gifts that you have already given to a family member

Every family’s situation is different, and there is no single right reason to disinherit someone. What matters most is that the decision is documented clearly and legally, so it is less likely to be challenged after your death.

What Is the Legal Process of Disinheriting Someone From a Will?

The legal process of leaving someone out of a will can vary somewhat depending on where you live, but a few general principles apply almost everywhere. First, your will must be signed and witnessed according to the laws of your state. If these formalities are not followed, the entire document could be at risk of being thrown out.

Second, many states require you to name the person you are excluding, or at least make clear that the omission was intentional. This step can prevent a court from assuming that you simply forgot about a close family member when the will was written.

Third, spouses often have special legal protections. In many states, a spouse cannot be fully disinherited, since the law grants a surviving spouse the right to claim a portion of the estate regardless of what a will says. Children usually do not have this same level of automatic protection, though the details may differ by state.

Working with an estate planning attorney can help you avoid mistakes that could unravel your plans later. A lawyer can also advise you on state-specific rules that might affect how your wishes will be carried out.

What Is a No-Contest Clause in a Will?

A no-contest clause, sometimes called an in terrorem clause, is a provision that discourages beneficiaries from challenging a will. Under this type of clause, a person who contests the will and loses can forfeit whatever inheritance they were originally set to receive.

The goal of a no-contest clause is to make a beneficiary think carefully before moving forward with estate litigation. If a disinherited family member believes they might have a case, a no-contest clause raises the stakes of pursuing that challenge. That said, some states limit how these clauses can be enforced, and courts may still allow a challenge if there is evidence of fraud or another serious problem with the will.

How Allegations of Undue Influence Could Affect Your Will

Undue influence is one of the most common grounds used to challenge a will. This type of claim may arise when someone alleges that a person used pressure, manipulation, or control to convince the person making a will to change their estate plan in a way that benefited the influencer.

Undue influence claims often surface when a caregiver, new spouse, or close companion receives a larger share of an estate based on changes that were made shortly before the person’s death, especially if that change was a departure from an earlier will. In these cases, courts may examine several factors, including the vulnerability of the person who made the will, the level of trust placed in the alleged influencer, and whether the changes seem consistent with the person’s known wishes.

Estate planning attorneys point to a few patterns that tend to insulate a will from this kind of challenge. Independent legal counsel matters. So does documenting the reasoning behind significant decisions, and making changes at a point well removed from any decline in health or heavy reliance on a single caregiver. Courts weighing these disputes give real weight to a clear paper trail, which makes intentions harder to question after the fact.

Can You Disinherit a Family Member Without a Will?

If you die without a valid will, state intestacy laws will decide how your property is divided. These laws follow a fixed order of priority, usually starting with your spouse and children, then moving to parents, siblings, and more distant relatives if no closer family members exist.

Intestacy laws do not consider your personal history, estrangement, or your actual wishes. If you die without a will, a family member you would have preferred to exclude could still inherit a share of your estate simply because of their legal relationship to you. This is one of the strongest reasons to create a will rather than leaving these decisions up to state law.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not provide legal, tax, estate planning, probate, financial, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for guidance from a qualified professional. Will requirements, disinheritance rules, spousal rights, no-contest clauses, undue influence claims, intestacy laws, and estate litigation outcomes can vary by state, court, family circumstances, and applicable law. Readers should consult a licensed estate planning attorney, probate attorney, tax professional, financial advisor, or other qualified professional before creating, changing, or relying on any estate plan.

How Do You Access Business Funding Without Pledging Any Collateral?

Kivo Daily Staff on August 11, 2026

Businesses built on services, knowledge, client relationships, and digital assets have few or no pledgeable physical assets to offer a lender. Performance-based direct lending addressed this by building underwriting models accurate enough to assess repayment probability from cash flow data alone, making collateral unnecessary for the evaluation of short-term capital risk.

The traditional collateral requirement served a specific and rational purpose in lending markets where assessing repayment probability required historical documents that could be manipulated, credit histories that could be thin or misleading, and business projections that could be optimistic to the point of uselessness. When lenders could not reliably assess whether a business would repay from future revenue, they required a specific asset they could claim in a default scenario as the financial backstop that covered the uncertainty.

Performance-based AI underwriting eliminates most of this uncertainty by evaluating what the business is actually doing right now. Twelve months of primary bank account transaction data provides a direct window into actual revenue volume, revenue consistency, cash management quality, existing debt obligations, and business cash flow patterns that are harder to manipulate than any document-based assessment. When the repayment probability assessment is based on this quality of real-time evidence, the collateral backstop becomes less necessary for the lender and more genuinely removable for the borrower.

What No Collateral Means in a Working Capital Agreement

No collateral in the working capital advance context means that no specific business asset is named in the agreement as pledged security against the advance. That covers equipment identified by serial number, a vehicle identified by VIN, and property identified by address. In a default scenario, the lender cannot repossess a specific designated asset. The business’s operational assets remain unencumbered during the advance period and can be sold, replaced, or otherwise managed according to normal business decisions without lender approval.

Most no-collateral working capital advances do include a UCC-1 blanket lien filing after funding. A UCC-1 is a public filing that gives the lender a legal interest in business assets as a class without designating any specific asset. The blanket lien does not restrict the business’s use of any particular asset during normal operations. It establishes the lender’s legal standing in a court proceeding if a default scenario reaches that level.

The distinction between a specific collateral pledge and a blanket UCC-1 lien is meaningful. Specific pledges carry repossession risk for the designated asset, while blanket liens are enforced through legal proceedings rather than physical asset seizure.

Asset-Light Businesses and Working Capital Access

The no-collateral working capital advance is particularly relevant for asset-light businesses. Professional services firms, technology companies, consulting practices, creative agencies, and staffing companies often derive most of their value from client relationships, proprietary processes, and billable capacity rather than from physical equipment or property. Because these businesses may have few assets that qualify as collateral under traditional lending standards, they have historically faced limited access to secured business loans despite having consistent revenue performance.

For example, a marketing agency with steady monthly client billings may be evaluated primarily on its revenue performance rather than on the assets it owns. Whether the agency’s main strengths are its client relationships and creative capacity or physical equipment and real estate is generally less relevant in a cash flow-based analysis. This accessibility helps explain why performance-based direct lending has become a common source of capital for asset-light businesses within the small business economy.

How an Existing Advance Affects Future Funding

If you currently have an active working capital advance, it appears in your bank statement as daily outgoing debits, and every new lender who evaluates your account will see it. The original funded amount tends to act as a reference ceiling for new offers. While that advance remains active, new offers are commonly reduced, because existing daily debt service lowers the cash flow available to support an additional repayment obligation. This is not a penalty.

It reflects how underwriting systems read existing obligations in a cash flow analysis. To be considered for a comparable or larger amount, the usual sequence is to repay the existing advance in full, then allow a period of clean bank statement history before reapplying. Thirty to sixty days is a common interval. Underwriting reads current cash flow, so the statement period immediately preceding an application carries the most weight.

How to Confirm No Collateral in Any Offer

Marketing claims about a no-collateral structure should be verified at the agreement level before making any commitment. The security section of the loan agreement identifies exactly which assets, if any, are pledged as collateral for the advance. A true no-collateral agreement will not identify any specific asset in that section. A UCC-1 blanket lien provision is different from a specific collateral pledge and does not necessarily mean the advance is collateralized in the traditional sense.

Reviewing the specific language in the security section, rather than relying solely on marketing descriptions, is an important part of confirming a no-collateral claim. The personal guarantee section should be reviewed separately, as a no-collateral advance may still include a full personal guarantee that could create personal liability for the business owner in the event of default. For qualifying borrowers at Fundivi, neither specific collateral pledges nor personal guarantees are required, according to agreement reviews conducted by businessloansiq.com and bestratedbusinessloans.com as part of their independent editorial assessments.

No-Collateral Funding for Different Business Types

Service businesses generate revenue from delivering expertise, labor, and knowledge to clients rather than from producing or selling physical goods. The recurring service revenue that flows through the primary bank account from ongoing client relationships provides the consistent deposit pattern that AI underwriting evaluates most favorably. Service businesses with long-term client contracts, subscription-based revenue, or retainer-based billing structures present particularly strong bank account profiles for no-collateral working capital qualification.

Technology businesses including software companies, platform operators, and digital service providers generate revenue from license fees, subscription charges, and usage-based billing that creates highly consistent daily and monthly deposit patterns. The predictability of subscription revenue is among the most favorable deposit patterns for AI underwriting evaluation, producing qualification outcomes that reflect the business’s genuine revenue reliability rather than applying conservative adjustments for revenue variation that does not exist in the subscription model.

How Fundivi Approaches Same-Day Working Capital and Business Term Loans

Fundivi operates as a direct lender in the United States and Canada, offering same-day working capital advances and business term loans to qualifying businesses. The process runs entirely online. It begins with a short application, and for qualifying applicants who submit before the afternoon processing cutoff, funds can reach the business bank account the same business day.

The platform uses AI-driven underwriting to evaluate the primary bank account cash flow rather than requiring tax returns, financial statements, or collateral pledges. Businesses with shorter operating histories, below-average credit scores, or no pledgeable physical assets are therefore assessed on current earnings rather than on what they have historically documented or owned. For qualifying borrowers, no personal guarantee is required. The total repayment amount is disclosed before any commitment is required.

Several platforms that compare lending options for business owners have named Fundivi a top-rated choice, including businessloansiq.com, bestratedbusinessloans.com, samedaybusinessloansonline.com, comparebusinessloansonline.com, and bestmcaloans.com. Their assessments cite the streamlined application process and same-day funding availability.

Prequalification on the Fundivi business funding platform returns an available amount and terms for the current business profile. It uses a soft credit inquiry, so it does not affect the credit score, and it carries no upfront commitment.

Additional market coverage is available in published comparisons of unsecured working capital business loans and working capital loans based on bank statements.

Questions and Answers

Is It Possible To Get A Working Capital Advance With Absolutely No Collateral At All?

Yes. Fundivi and similar performance-based direct lenders do not require specific collateral pledges from qualifying borrowers. The advance is underwritten entirely on bank account cash flow performance. Most platforms do file a UCC-1 blanket lien on general business assets after funding, but this is categorically different from pledging a specific identified asset and does not restrict the business’s use of any particular equipment or inventory during the advance period.

What Is The Difference Between No Collateral And No Personal Guarantee?

No collateral means no specific business asset is pledged as security against the advance in the agreement. No personal guarantee means the business owner is not personally liable for the outstanding balance in a default scenario. Both protections together mean the lender’s recourse in a default runs only to the business entity’s cash flow and general assets through legal proceedings rather than to any specific designated asset or to the owner’s personal financial accounts. Not all no-collateral advances also include no personal guarantee, so both sections of the agreement require specific review.

Can A Business With No Physical Assets Qualify For A Substantial Working Capital Advance?

Yes. Qualification at performance-based direct lenders is calculated from average monthly bank deposits rather than from the value of what a business owns. The absence of physical assets does not change that calculation. A consulting firm with strong monthly billings and no equipment is evaluated on the same cash flow basis as a manufacturer with a warehouse full of machinery.

How Does The No-Collateral Structure Affect The Cost Of Working Capital?

No-collateral working capital from performance-based direct lenders carries higher effective rates than collateral-secured bank lending. The rate premium reflects the speed, accessibility, and minimal documentation advantages of the no-collateral product rather than specifically the absence of collateral. The most directly comparable rate comparison would be between no-collateral working capital and unsecured bank business loans, where the rate difference is smaller than the comparison to collateral-secured bank term loans.

Will My Business Assets Be Protected If I Default On A No-Collateral Advance?

Advances that do not require specific collateral reduce the risk that designated business assets will be directly repossessed if a borrower defaults. However, many lenders still file a UCC-1 blanket lien, which gives them a legal claim to the business’s broader assets. In a serious default situation, those assets may still be pursued through legal proceedings. Therefore, while a no-collateral arrangement limits the immediate risk of losing specifically pledged assets, it does not remove the lender’s ability to seek recovery from general business assets.

How Quickly Can I Access No-Collateral Working Capital After Deciding To Apply?

For same-day working capital applications at Fundivi submitted before the afternoon processing cutoff, the sequence from application through approval to funded account is built to complete within the same business day. No appraisal, collateral assessment, asset identification, or security documentation is required, which removes the preparation steps that extend timelines for collateral-secured products.

Does The No-Collateral Structure At Fundivi Apply To All Advance Amounts?

The no-collateral structure applies across the advance range available through Fundivi for qualifying borrowers. The specific available advance amount for any business profile is confirmed through the prequalification process. Neither the advance amount nor the advance purpose changes the collateral structure for qualifying borrowers.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or lending advice. Financing terms, rates, eligibility requirements, funding amounts, collateral requirements, personal guarantees, and funding timelines vary based on the applicant, lender, jurisdiction, and underwriting criteria. Approval and same-day funding are not guaranteed. Business owners should carefully review all financing agreements and consult an appropriate financial or legal professional before entering into any funding arrangement.

Exit Planning and M&A Tax Strategy from AE Tax Advisors for Business Owners

Kivo Daily Staff on August 10, 2026

The sale of a business is one of the largest financial events of a business owner’s life, often representing the cumulative value of decades of operating work, compressed into a single transaction. The tax outcome of that transaction can vary dramatically based on the structure of the sale, the entity type of the business, the holding period of the equity, the buyer’s preferred deal structure, and the seller’s specific tax situation. The difference

between an optimally structured exit and a default exit can amount to millions of dollars in after-tax proceeds.

AE Tax Advisors, the tax advisory firm headquartered in Billings, Montana, has built a Retirement, Exit & M&A Strategy specialty around the tax planning required for business sales. The work involves structuring the exit several years before the transaction, optimizing the deal structure during negotiation, and managing the post-sale tax position to maximize after-tax outcomes for the business owner.

The exit planning conversation typically begins several years before the anticipated sale. The reason is that many of the most powerful tax strategies require advance positioning to deploy effectively.

The first strategy is the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) treatment under IRC §1202. C-Corporation stock held for more than five years can qualify for federal capital gains exclusion of up to $10 million or 10 times basis (whichever is greater) per shareholder. The treatment is significant; for many business owners, the §1202 exclusion can transform the tax outcome of the sale. The challenge is that the structure must be in place for the full five year holding period, which means entity restructuring decisions made today affect the tax outcome five years from now. AE Tax Advisors evaluates QSBS positioning with business owners who may eventually exit and structures the entity accordingly.

The second strategy is the installment sale structure under IRC §453. Spreading the sale proceeds across multiple tax years can produce significant tax savings by avoiding bracket bunching in a single year. The structure has specific requirements and trade-offs, and AE Tax Advisors models the installment sale outcome against the lump-sum alternative for each client to identify the optimal structure.

The third strategy is the asset sale versus stock sale distinction. The deal structure, whether the buyer purchases assets or equity, has substantial tax implications for both buyer and seller. Sellers typically prefer stock sales (one transaction, potential for QSBS treatment, often capital gain treatment). Buyers typically prefer asset sales (stepped-up basis in the acquired assets, ability to allocate purchase price favorably, no inherited entity liabilities). The negotiation between these preferences is a significant part of M&A tax work, and AE Tax Advisors represents the seller’s tax interests in that negotiation.

The fourth strategy is the allocation of purchase price across asset categories in asset sales. Different asset categories receive different tax treatment: goodwill is generally capital gain, equipment is recapture income, real property has its own rules, and intangibles have specific treatment. The allocation negotiation determines how the sale price flows into different tax buckets, and the work AE Tax Advisors does in this area can shift millions of dollars in tax outcomes.

The fifth strategy is the integration with retirement and wealth planning. The proceeds from

a business sale typically need to be deployed into retirement-funding, wealth-management, and estate-planning vehicles. The timing and structure of these deployments interact with the sale transaction in ways that AE Tax Advisors coordinates as part of the broader engagement.

The sixth strategy is the Opportunity Zone investment, where appropriate. Sale proceeds invested in Qualified Opportunity Zone Funds within specific timing windows can produce deferred and potentially reduced capital gains treatment. The strategy is not for every seller but can produce meaningful tax benefits for the right situation.

The seventh strategy is the multi-state sourcing of sale proceeds. Business owners who have operated across multiple states or who are considering residency changes before or after the sale face complex sourcing rules that determine which states tax which components of the sale. AE Tax Advisors integrates multi-state planning into the exit strategy where the geographic exposure makes it relevant.

The firm’s annual $7,800 advisory engagement includes the multi-year exit planning work, with quarterly check-ins that revisit the exit positioning as the business and the market evolve. The proprietary 3-Year Tax Lookback evaluates whether prior business decisions were aligned with eventual exit objectives and identifies any catch-up positioning that should be completed.

AE Tax Advisors’ team, IRS Enrolled Agents and licensed CPAs led by Christina Nortman, has worked with business owners through exit transactions across multiple industries and deal sizes. The firm coordinates with the client’s M&A attorneys, investment bankers, and other transaction advisors to ensure the tax planning is integrated with the broader deal execution.

For business owners considering eventual exit, whether through sale, generational transition, or wind-down, the AE Tax Advisors conversation is one of the higher-leverage moves available in the strategic tax planning category. The advance planning matters. The structural positioning matters. And the difference between an optimized exit and a default exit can represent the difference between an outcome the owner is satisfied with and one that fundamentally changes the family’s financial trajectory.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, tax, or legal advice. While the article aims to highlight common strategies and trends, it does not consider individual circumstances. Readers are encouraged to consult with a qualified professional for advice tailored to their specific situation.

From “What the Troll?” to “Have You Loved Like a Tree?” and How Shweta Harve Continues to Build a Career Rooted in Purpose

Kivo Daily Staff on August 8, 2026

By: Chris Richards

Success in the music industry is often measured in streams, chart positions, and sold-out performances. Yet some artists leave their mark in another way entirely, by creating songs that spark conversations, challenge assumptions, and inspire reflection. Singer-songwriter Shweta Harve has steadily established herself as one of those artists, building a body of work defined by memorable melodies and meaningful messages.

Over the past few years, Harve has attracted increasing attention for her ability to blend contemporary pop sensibilities with thoughtful storytelling. That momentum reached a new milestone when her single “What the Troll?” earned recognition on the Mediabase Adult Contemporary chart, marking a significant achievement for the independent artist.

The song addressed one of the most pressing issues of the digital age, the growing culture of hostility and anonymity that has flourished across social media platforms. Rather than merely criticizing online behavior, Harve approached the subject with a combination of insight, wit, and empathy. The song explored the emotional consequences of digital cruelty while encouraging listeners to reflect upon the ways technology influences human interaction.

At a time when social media conversations often feel dominated by outrage and division, “What the Troll?” offered something different. It asked difficult questions while remaining accessible, proving that socially conscious songwriting can still resonate with broad audiences.

Its success on the Mediabase chart represented more than a personal accomplishment. It also underscored the increasing power of independent artists to connect with listeners through authenticity rather than convention. In an industry often driven by fleeting trends, Harve demonstrated that substance and sincerity still matter.

The accomplishment became another chapter in a career built on a simple but powerful philosophy: music should entertain, but it should also encourage people to think, feel, and connect.

That philosophy continues with Harve’s latest release, “Have You Loved Like a Tree?”

Where “What the Troll?” examined the challenges of modern communication, the new single turns its attention toward timeless questions of compassion, resilience, generosity, and unconditional love. Drawing inspiration from nature, the song uses the image of a tree as a symbol of quiet strength and selfless giving.

The central question at the heart of the song (“Have you loved like a tree?”) is deceptively simple. Trees provide shelter, nourishment, protection, and beauty while asking for very little in return. By inviting listeners to consider whether their own relationships reflect those qualities, Harve transforms a familiar image into a deeply personal meditation.

Musically, the song reflects the same spirit of balance and intentionality found in its lyrics. Warm acoustic arrangements, subtle instrumental textures, and an intimate vocal performance create an atmosphere that encourages contemplation rather than distraction. The result is a recording that feels both contemporary and timeless.

The contrast between the two songs reveals the remarkable breadth of Harve’s artistic vision.

“What the Troll?” addresses the noise of the digital world and the challenges of maintaining humanity in an era of constant connection. “Have You Loved Like a Tree?” responds with a quieter message, reminding listeners that patience, kindness, and generosity remain among our most valuable qualities.

Taken together, the songs illustrate an artist who is unafraid to examine both the problems and possibilities of modern life.

Harve’s growing reputation has also been strengthened by her collaborative spirit. Throughout her career, she has worked alongside accomplished musicians, producers, and visual artists, bringing a distinctive perspective to every project while remaining committed to her own creative identity. Her willingness to experiment with new ideas has enabled her music to reach audiences across cultural and geographical boundaries.

As an independent artist, she has consistently embraced the challenges of a rapidly changing music industry, demonstrating that determination and authenticity can be every bit as valuable as commercial machinery.

For Harve, success appears to be measured not solely by numbers but by impact. Her songs seek to build bridges between people, encouraging listeners to slow down, examine their lives, and rediscover the values that often become obscured by the relentless pace of modern life.

That approach may explain why her work continues to resonate so deeply with audiences.

From the chart success of “What the Troll?” to the introspective beauty of “Have You Loved Like a Tree?”, Shweta Harve has shown that music can still be a vehicle for meaningful conversation. In an era defined by constant noise, she continues to offer something increasingly rare: songs that invite us not merely to listen, but to reflect.

And judging by the path she has already created, her journey is only beginning.

Why Strong Leadership Is the Foundation of Tomorrow’s Workplace

Kivo Daily Staff on August 7, 2026

Shayla N. Atkins on Building Cultures That Thrive Through Change

The modern workplace is facing one of the most significant leadership tests in history. Artificial intelligence is transforming how work gets done. Employees are redefining what they expect from employers. Hybrid workplaces continue to evolve, generational shifts are reshaping organizational dynamics, and economic uncertainty has become a constant rather than an exception.

Yet despite advances in technology, one truth remains unchanged. Organizations don’t rise or fall because of technology alone; they rise or fall because of leadership. Strong leadership has become one of the greatest competitive advantages a company can possess. Leaders establish culture, build trust, guide organizations through uncertainty, and create environments where innovation can flourish.

Without intentional leadership, even the most ambitious business strategies struggle to gain traction.

Few understand this reality better than Shayla N. Atkins, Founder and CEO of The Atkins IMPACT Consulting Firm. A former Fortune 500 Global Human Resources executive and organizational development strategist, Atkins has spent more than two decades helping organizations transform their cultures, strengthen leadership pipelines, and position themselves for long-term success.

Her work is built around a simple but powerful belief. Better leaders create better cultures. Better cultures create better businesses. That philosophy shows up in her firm’s stated mission of building better workplace cultures, developing future-ready leaders, and driving business results.

Building Better Workplace Cultures. Developing Future-Ready Leaders. Driving Business Results.

Leadership Is No Longer About Managing People

For generations, leadership was often defined by authority, expertise, and operational efficiency. Today’s workplace demands something very different. Modern leaders must inspire trust during uncertainty, guide teams through rapid technological change, cultivate psychological safety, manage multiple generations in the workforce, and make difficult decisions without losing sight of the people behind the business.

According to Atkins, organizations cannot prepare for the future by focusing exclusively on systems, processes, or technology. They must also prepare their people. Throughout her career, she has observed that organizations often invest heavily in technology without developing the leadership capabilities needed to help employees adapt to and embrace change. The result can be resistance, disengagement, declining morale, and missed opportunities.

Technology may accelerate business, but leadership determines whether people are willing to move forward together.

Culture Doesn’t Happen by Accident

One of the biggest misconceptions in business is that workplace culture develops naturally. In reality, culture is created every day through leadership decisions. It is reflected in how employees are treated, how conflict is handled, how communication flows, and whether people genuinely believe they belong.

At The Atkins IMPACT Consulting Firm, culture transformation is approached as a strategic business initiative rather than a human resources program. The firm partners with organizations across industries, including government, utilities, manufacturing, energy, and Fortune 500 companies, helping leadership teams align strategy, operations, and people. Rather than offering temporary solutions, Atkins focuses on creating sustainable organizational change through leadership development, change management, employee engagement, strategic alignment, and values-driven decision-making. The goal is not simply happier employees. The goal is stronger organizations.

Research consistently shows that organizations with healthy workplace cultures experience higher employee engagement, improved retention, stronger collaboration, increased innovation, and greater financial performance. As competition for talent intensifies, workplace culture has become one of the defining factors influencing whether employees choose to join, or remain with, an organization. For today’s leaders, culture is no longer a “soft skill.” It is a business strategy.

Leading Through the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing nearly every industry. While many conversations focus on automation and efficiency, Atkins believes organizations risk overlooking the most important variable in successful AI adoption, which is people.

Her keynote, The Human Side of AI, challenges executives to think beyond technology implementation and examine the leadership behaviors required to guide teams through transformation. Technology may evolve overnight. People do not.

Successful AI integration requires communication, trust, transparency, adaptability, and leaders who can hold steady through uncertainty while maintaining employee confidence. Organizations that invest in developing these leadership capabilities give their teams a clearer path through the transition.

Authentic Leadership Creates Lasting Influence

Beyond her consulting work, Atkins has become a respected voice on authentic leadership. Her award-winning book, Black Women Lead with S.P.I.C.E., encourages women to lead with confidence, purpose, and authenticity rather than conformity. The message resonates far beyond its intended audience because authentic leadership is increasingly recognized as one of the defining characteristics of effective executives.

Employees today expect leaders who communicate honestly, demonstrate empathy, foster inclusion, and lead with integrity. Those qualities build trust. And trust builds resilient organizations.

Preparing Leaders for the Future

Organizations cannot predict every disruption they will face. They can, however, prepare leaders capable of handling whatever comes next. That preparation requires more than technical expertise. It demands emotional intelligence, strategic thinking, adaptability, and a commitment to building cultures where people have room to contribute their best work.

These principles have positioned Shayla N. Atkins among today’s leading voices in leadership development. A recipient of the Presidential Lifetime Achievement Award, she has shared her insights through major media outlets, executive leadership forums, and organizations seeking practical strategies for sustainable growth.

Her message continues to resonate because it addresses one of today’s most pressing business challenges. How do organizations remain competitive while creating workplaces where people genuinely want to stay, grow, and lead? For Atkins, the answer begins with leadership.

As businesses absorb constant disruption, the organizations that outperform their competitors won’t simply be those with the newest technology or the biggest budgets. They will be the ones led by individuals who understand that culture is built intentionally, trust is earned daily, and people remain every organization’s greatest competitive advantage. Strong leadership isn’t simply important. It is essential.

Connect with Shayla Atkins.

Holding Steady Through the Storm: Ashley Puckett Finds Strength in “Anchor”

Kivo Daily Staff on August 5, 2026

By John Smith

Country music has always had a way of turning life’s most complicated emotions into something simple, honest, and profoundly human. Love, heartbreak, redemption, resilience, and hope have long formed the foundation of the genre’s greatest songs. Ashley Puckett’s “Anchor” belongs squarely within that tradition, delivering a heartfelt message of unwavering support wrapped in a polished contemporary country arrangement.

Released in 2024, “Anchor” showcases another dimension of the western Pennsylvania singer-songwriter’s artistic evolution. Co-written by Puckett alongside Andrew Douglas and Nathan Beatty, the single builds upon the songwriting chemistry that previously produced her Music Row-charting single, “Tequila.” Where that song leaned into reflection and regret, “Anchor” reaches toward reassurance, exploring what it means to stand beside someone when life has become uncertain.

From its opening lines, the song establishes an atmosphere of vulnerability:

“You think I’ve got no reason / You think I have no place / But I’ve been closer to the bottom / Hmm … closer than you think.”

Rather than portraying herself as a savior, the narrator presents herself as someone who understands hardship firsthand. That perspective gives the song its emotional credibility. Country music audiences have always had a keen sense for authenticity, and “Anchor” succeeds because it never feels forced or overly sentimental.

The central metaphor is both familiar and effective. An anchor symbolizes stability, security, and steadfast devotion, and Puckett uses the image to great effect throughout the song. The chorus, in particular, captures the essence of the message:

“Let me be your anchor / While you take the time to fix what you think’s broken.”

What makes the lyric especially compelling is the subtle shift in perspective that occurs as the song unfolds. The narrator initially offers support to someone struggling with emotional burdens, but by the final verse, an even more powerful realization emerges: perhaps the person isn’t broken at all.

“Let me be your anchor / While you take the time to realize you’re not broken.”

That single change transforms the song from a simple love ballad into something much more profound. It becomes an affirmation of patience, compassion, and acceptance.

Vocally, Puckett delivers one of her strongest performances to date. She understands that not every emotional song requires grand theatrics. Instead, she relies on warmth, sincerity, and careful phrasing to convey the song’s emotional weight. Her voice carries a natural clarity that recalls the storytelling traditions of artists such as Lee Ann Womack and Jo Dee Messina while maintaining a style distinctly her own.

The production complements the song’s message beautifully. Acoustic instrumentation provides the foundation, while layered harmonies and subtle dynamic changes allow the arrangement to grow naturally alongside the narrative. Nothing feels excessive or out of place. Every musical element serves the story, reinforcing the song’s central theme of constancy amid life’s inevitable turbulence.

There is also an admirable maturity to the writing. Modern country music can sometimes confuse complexity with depth, burying simple truths beneath layers of elaborate production or clever turns of phrase. “Anchor” takes the opposite approach. Its power lies in its straightforward honesty. The song recognizes that some of life’s greatest acts of love are also the quietest: listening, waiting, supporting, and remaining present when someone else feels adrift.

That sentiment feels particularly timely. In an era marked by uncertainty and disconnection, “Anchor” serves as a reminder that strength is often found not in standing alone but in allowing others to stand beside us.

For longtime fans of Ashley Puckett, the single represents another significant step forward in a career built on perseverance and authenticity. For listeners discovering her music for the first time, “Anchor” offers an excellent introduction to an artist whose greatest strength may be her ability to make deeply personal experiences feel universal.

Like the object from which it takes its name, “Anchor” is steady, dependable, and reassuring. More importantly, it demonstrates that Ashley Puckett understands one of country music’s enduring truths: the most memorable songs aren’t always the loudest. Sometimes, they’re the ones that quietly remind us that we don’t have to weather the storm alone.

Gina Nichols on Why Strong Women Are Exhausted

Kivo Daily Staff on August 4, 2026

By: STAGE IIX, editorial staff

Praise can work like pressure. Strong women hear it constantly, usually delivered as admiration for how much they manage without complaint. One woman holds down a demanding job, runs a household, checks on aging parents, remembers everyone’s birthdays, and absorbs the emotional weather of every relationship she is in. The work keeps getting done, so almost no one asks what it costs her.

She rarely asks either. That question sits at the center of what Gina Nichols does as a speaker and the founder of Gina Nichols Coaching, a post-divorce coaching practice for women behind the program DIVORCE: Redefined. “When a woman is praised for how much she can carry, she may never stop to ask why she is carrying it all,” Nichols says.

What Separates Genuine Strength From Survival Mode?

Genuine strength includes limits. A strong woman operating from it can be highly capable while still naming what she needs, accepting help, and making decisions that account for her own well-being. Survival-based strength runs on different instructions. Keep going, handle it alone, ask for as little as possible, and let no one see the strain.

That second version usually begins as a reasonable answer to a hard season, and it works, which is part of the trouble. A response that once carried a woman through financial upheaval, a difficult marriage, or years of solo parenting can harden into the only way she knows how to live.

Gina Nichols puts the cost of that in blunt terms. “Somewhere along the way, many women began mistaking self-neglect for selflessness and exhaustion for proof that they were doing enough.”

Why Overfunctioning Gets Rewarded

Strong women rarely arrive at overfunctioning on their own, because the pattern is reinforced from the outside. The more a woman carries without complaint, the more dependable she looks, and dependability attracts more responsibility. Admiration follows. So does everyone else’s reliance on her.

Being needed can become part of how she understands herself. Her sense of value starts tracking with her usefulness to other people, or with how much she can absorb before something gives. Capability slides into overfunctioning around this point, and self-neglect begins passing for devotion.

None of this requires bad intentions or conscious martyrdom. In most cases, she loves the people she is caring for and wants to be generous with them. What she also learned, often early, is that being a good mother, wife, daughter, friend, or employee means putting herself last. Guilt arrives when she rests, holds a boundary, or admits she wants something different.

Many strong women never label the self-abandonment as a problem at all. It has been treated for generations as evidence of love and loyalty.

How Comparison Culture Raises the Bar

Social media adds another layer to all of it. Women scroll past curated proof of other women apparently excelling at career, marriage, motherhood, fitness, friendship, caregiving, and personal growth, with a tidy self-care routine on top. The reasonable conclusion is that nobody is doing all of that. The more common conclusion is that everyone else has worked out something she has missed.

So she pushes harder, hides the fatigue, and asks for even less. Beneath the competence there can be loneliness, resentment, and real distance from what she actually wants. Some women quietly hope someone will notice the weight while making it nearly impossible for anyone to step in. “I’ll handle it” feels safer than depending on a person who might not come through.

For many strong women, what looks like independence is sometimes a protective habit built from years of necessity and disappointment.

Why Are Strong Women Told to Get Stronger After Divorce?

Advice aimed at women rebuilding after divorce tends to arrive with a single instruction, which is to get stronger. Gina Nichols pushes back on that framing. The strong women she works with have already survived betrayal, financial disruption, single parenting, caregiving, professional demands, and the slow labor of reassembling a life. Asking them to demonstrate that strength again by carrying more misses the actual problem.

Divorce often makes the pattern impossible to ignore. A woman may see how long she kept everything and everyone running while steadily setting herself aside. The same recognition reaches women who never divorced at all. Marriage, motherhood, caregiving, demanding careers, and family expectations each supply their own route to disappearing gradually.

Nichols draws on professional training alongside her own history, which includes three divorces, co-parenting, blended-family dynamics, betrayal, and personal reinvention. Her coaching centers on honest reflection, radical personal responsibility, and practical change, with attention to recognizing overfunctioning, self-abandonment, guilt, shame, and resentment where they turn up.

In a published interview with CEO Weekly on rebuilding self-worth after divorce, she described the mechanics of it. “Confidence grows when you keep promises to yourself,” Nichols says. “Self-worth grows when you stop requiring permission to matter.”

Rethinking the Strength Women Are Taught to Admire

Gina Nichols builds the deeper work around a few plain corrections. Self-neglect is not a virtue. Exhaustion is not proof of devotion. Asking for support is not a character flaw.

Rest, love, and belonging are not privileges a woman earns by making herself indispensable. A healthier version of strength has room for receiving help, saying out loud what she needs, holding boundaries, and letting other adults carry their own responsibilities. It also means retiring the habit of measuring her worth by how much she can tolerate.

DIVORCE: Redefined rests on the premise that divorce does not determine a woman’s worth or close her story. Nichols describes it instead as the moment a woman stops letting another person’s choices define her and starts reclaiming her peace, identity, and purpose. In her view, the shift is not about becoming someone entirely new. It is about reconnecting with who she is, deciding what she will no longer tolerate, and moving toward who she meant to become.

The theme recurs across her public work, including a conversation with NY Wire on why being chosen is not the same as being worthy. She covers similar ground in her coaching content on Instagram, where much of the material returns to self-trust and identity.

Strength can carry a woman through one chapter without becoming the prison she drags into the next. Nothing about that asks her to be less capable, less caring, or less resilient. The invitation is to stop believing those qualities require her to disappear.

Joel Yi Stopped Asking How to Hire and Started Asking How to Automate

Kivo Daily Staff on August 4, 2026

A single change in question can redirect a career. For Joel Yi, the founder of DeployAIBots, the turning point came when he stopped asking how to hire more people and started asking how to reduce a company’s dependence on people for repetitive work. That shift, simple as it sounds, became the foundation for much of what he has built in artificial intelligence.

Joel Yi has described the change in his own thinking with clarity. Early in his exposure to AI, he realized that one person equipped with the right systems could produce the output of a much larger team. That realization altered the questions he found worth asking.

The traditional path of business growth, where more work means more hires, suddenly looked like only one option among several. Instead of defaulting to hiring, Joel Yi began to wonder how much of a company’s repetitive work could be handled by systems rather than staff.

The new question pointed him toward entrepreneurship. Joel Yi has said he cared more about building systems that scale than about building teams that need constant management. That preference is more than a personality trait. It reflects a considered view that systems, once built well, can handle predictable work reliably and more cost-effectively than continually expanding a workforce to keep up.

DeployAIBots grew directly out of this conviction.

The company builds agentic AI and automation designed to execute operational work rather than simply assist with it. From its Miami headquarters, DeployAIBots installs systems designed to take over repetitive tasks such as scheduling, customer communication, and internal coordination.

These are the kinds of activities that, under the old model, might have driven a company to hire more people as it grew. Joel Yi’s question, how to automate rather than how to hire, finds its answer in these systems.

He is careful to explain what the shift does not mean. Asking how to automate is not the same as asking how to eliminate people from a business. Joel Yi frames it as a way to free people from the repetitive, lower-value tasks that consume their time without making full use of their skills.

The work that genuinely requires human judgment and creativity remains in human hands. What changes is the routine layer of the operation, the predictable tasks that systems can handle more consistently. The goal is to let people focus on what they do best rather than drowning in busywork that scales faster than they can manage.

The reframing also changes the economics of growth. Hiring can be expensive, slow, and difficult to reverse. Each new role adds ongoing cost and commits a company to a fixed expense that may not match future demand. Automation offers a different profile, allowing a business to expand capacity without locking in the same long-term costs.

Joel Yi argues that companies willing to ask how to automate may gain flexibility that companies wedded to hiring do not have.

His background made him receptive to this way of thinking. As one of the first cyber officers in the United States Army cyber branch, Joel Yi learned to rely on well-designed systems to handle demanding work under pressure. That experience reinforced his trust in systems as a foundation.

Combined with his early machine learning work, including a 2018 model that identified rare plant species, it gave him both the confidence and technical grounding to pursue automation seriously.

Joel Yi acknowledges that his question runs against deep habits. For much of business history, growth and hiring have been closely linked, and many companies still treat adding staff as the natural response to rising demand.

Asking how to automate instead requires a shift in mindset that not every organization is ready to make. But Joel Yi believes the companies that embrace the new question may hold an advantage, able to grow more efficiently than those still defaulting to the old one.

The proof, for Joel Yi, is in his own company. DeployAIBots reports reclaiming more than 150 hours of work each week by running its own technology internally, capacity it gained without hiring.

That figure is the practical result of the question he started asking years ago. For Joel Yi, the lesson is that the path a company takes often depends on the questions it is willing to ask, and that in an age of artificial intelligence, asking how to automate may matter more than asking how to hire.

Follow us on: