Thursday, August 6
Business · Technology · Leadership

Marketing Crunch Is Turning The Lens On The People Who Shape Tech’s Reputation

The technology industry is full of companies competing for attention, but there is another competition happening behind the scenes: the competition among the firms and professionals responsible for earning that attention.

Marketing Crunch is launching a platform aimed directly at that market. The website will review PR firms and individual marketers, creating a destination for evaluating the people and organizations that help technology companies build visibility.

Its “Rotten Tomatoes of tech marketing” positioning makes the premise easy to understand. The platform is taking a review concept that has become familiar to consumers and applying it to the professionals who work in marketing and public relations.

The Industry Behind The Industry

PR firms and marketers rarely operate in the spotlight themselves. Their work is usually intended to put someone else there, whether that means a startup founder, a new product or a company announcing its latest milestone.

That creates an unusual situation in which the professionals responsible for managing reputation are themselves largely evaluated through indirect signals. Client lists, media placements, awards, and personal networks can all contribute to an agency’s standing, but none necessarily provides a complete picture.

Marketing Crunch is designed to bring another perspective into the process by making reviews part of how these firms and professionals can be assessed.

Why The Individual Matters

The marketing business has become increasingly tied to individual expertise. A company might choose an agency because of its brand, but the actual relationship is often built around the people assigned to the account.

That makes individual marketers an important part of the platform’s concept. Marketing Crunch is not only reviewing firms; it is also creating space for individual professionals to be evaluated.

The distinction could prove useful in a market where personal reputation can travel independently of an employer. A marketer who has built strong industry relationships and expertise may carry that reputation across agencies, companies, and independent work.

A Public Record Of Professional Reputation

Reviews can change how information is gathered. Instead of learning about a provider exclusively through its own materials or through private recommendations, prospective clients can potentially consult a dedicated platform before making contact.

For marketing firms, that adds another dimension to reputation management. For clients, it adds another research tool.

The two sides may also use the platform differently. A company could turn to Marketing Crunch while building a shortlist, while a marketer could view a profile as another representation of their professional identity.

The Test Will Be Credibility

The basic idea behind Marketing Crunch is easy to communicate. Building a trusted review platform is the more difficult part.

For reviews to become meaningful, users need to believe they provide useful context rather than simply reflecting isolated opinions. The platform also needs to establish credibility among the firms and individuals it covers.

That makes Marketing Crunch’s own reputation an interesting part of its launch story. A company created to evaluate marketing reputations will itself have to establish a reputation for fairness, usefulness and trust.

If it manages to do that, the platform could create a new reference point for an industry that has spent decades helping everyone else manage how they are perceived.

LinkedIn Split Feed Tests Two Paths for B2B Founder Reach

LinkedIn split feed testing is separating posts from known connections from broader professional discovery. LinkedIn is testing “Network” and “For You” tabs, a change that could affect how B2B founders assess reach, audience quality, and thought leadership. This feature explains what LinkedIn has confirmed, what remains uncertain, and why the test matters for founder-led marketing.

Key Takeaways

  • LinkedIn is testing separate “Network” and “For You” tabs at the top of the feed
  • Network centers posts from people a member has connected with or followed, while For You supports broader discovery
  • LinkedIn’s feed already uses large language models and generative ranking systems to assess relevance
  • Edelman and LinkedIn found 56% of target decision-makers and 55% of hidden decision-makers use thought leadership when evaluating providers
  • LinkedIn has not said the split feed guarantees wider reach

LinkedIn Split Feed Separates Discovery From Existing Networks

LinkedIn’s latest feed test gives professional discovery and existing relationships separate places in the interface. On Sept. 18, 2026, LinkedIn Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan said the company was testing a new design with Network and For You tabs.

“The Network tab helps you stay connected to your network,” Srinivasan wrote. He described that network as people a member has explicitly connected with or followed. For You, he said, is intended to surface perspectives from practitioners inside and outside a member’s network.

The test makes a long-standing difference more visible. Network is designed around chosen professional relationships, while For You keeps broader discovery in a separate surface. LinkedIn has not published a new ranking formula for either tab.

For B2B founders, that creates a clearer distinction between content reaching an existing audience and content discovered by someone new. It also gives founder-led marketing strategy a more concrete platform question: whether a post is strengthening an established relationship or reaching beyond it.

LinkedIn’s Feed Ranking Already Shifted Toward Relevance

The split-feed test follows a major technical change to LinkedIn’s recommendation system earlier in 2026. In a March 12 engineering post, LinkedIn said it was rolling out a feed-ranking system powered by large language models, transformer models, and GPUs across a platform serving more than 1.3 billion professionals.

LinkedIn said the system evaluates profile signals, including industry, experience, skills, and geography, alongside behavior such as what members read, like, comment on, revisit, or skip. Its generative recommender can process more than 1,000 historical interactions to identify patterns in a member’s interests.

The company also said its retrieval system can surface relevant posts from authors a member does not follow. That capability is relevant to For You because discovery beyond an existing network was already part of LinkedIn’s ranking architecture before the new interface appeared.

For thought leadership communication, topical clarity may therefore give LinkedIn more contextual information than broad subject switching, although the company does not disclose a simple formula creators can follow. LinkedIn has also said it is reducing generic content, engagement bait, automated comments, and other inauthentic activity.

B2B Founder Marketing Faces a New Measurement Split

The business relevance becomes clearer alongside B2B buying research. The 2025 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Report surveyed nearly 2,000 management-level professionals and found that 56% of target decision-makers and 55% of hidden decision-makers used thought leadership as part of provider evaluation.

LinkedIn Split Feed Tests Two Paths for B2B Founder Reach

Photo Credit: Unsplash.com

The same research found that 64% of target decision-makers and 63% of hidden decision-makers spent more than an hour per week consuming thought leadership. The findings do not show that LinkedIn posts directly cause buying decisions, but they support the broader role of expert content in B2B evaluation.

The split feed may complicate how founder content is assessed. A post seen mainly by existing connections may reinforce familiarity with people already inside a founder’s professional network. A post surfaced through For You may introduce the founder to people with no prior connection.

That distinction could make impression totals less informative when viewed alone. Profile visits, new follows, relevant comments, repeat engagement, and audience composition may provide additional context. LinkedIn has not tied the split-feed test to a new creator analytics framework, so those measures still require careful interpretation.

The interface could also increase attention on deliberate follows. If members use Network to catch up with accounts they intentionally follow, earning a follow may carry different practical value from a single recommended impression. That is an implication of the design, not a confirmed distribution change.

For B2B founders, the LinkedIn split feed is best understood as a test of how the platform separates relationship-driven content from recommendation-driven discovery. Any broader effect on reach, follower value, or founder marketing performance will depend on how LinkedIn develops the test and how members use the two tabs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the LinkedIn split feed?

The LinkedIn split feed is a test that separates the feed into Network and For You tabs. Network focuses on people a member has connected with or followed, while For You can surface relevant perspectives from inside and outside that network.

Is the split feed available to everyone?

LinkedIn has described the design as a test, so it should not be treated as a universal permanent rollout. Some members may see the tabs while others may continue to see a different feed experience.

Why does the Network tab matter for B2B founders?

The Network tab gives members a dedicated place to view posts from selected connections and followed accounts. For founders, that may make relationship-based visibility and broader discovery easier to distinguish.

Does the split feed guarantee more reach?

No. LinkedIn has not said the tabs guarantee higher reach, more impressions, or better results. The test changes how members can navigate content, while distribution still depends on LinkedIn’s ranking systems and member behavior.